search results

A curtain wall elevation can appear resolved long before its details are ready to build. The critical work begins where glass meets frame, frame meets slab edge, and one system meets another. Knowing how to design curtain wall details means controlling these interfaces as a coordinated performance system, not treating them as isolated drawing exercises. For complex airports, hotels, hospitals, towers and commercial developments, small unresolved conditions can become major site risks: uncontrolled water paths, misaligned anchors, broken fire compartmentation, thermal bridges, glass breakage or access constraints that emerge only after installation. A successful detail protects architectural intent while giving the fabricator, installer and site team a clear, toleranced route to delivery. Start with the system, not the section A detail cannot compensate for an undefined facade strategy. Before producing enlarged sections, establish the curtain wall typology, grid, support philosophy, glazing method, pressure-equalisation approach and relationship to the primary structure. Unitised and stick systems demand different assumptions around movement, interfaces, sequencing and tolerances. For a high-rise unitised facade, inter-storey movement, slab-edge tolerances and stack-joint behaviour are central to the design. The panels must accommodate anticipated deflection and building movement without losing weathering continuity. For stick curtain walling, the detail must account for site assembly, mullion splices, glazing sequence, drained zones and the practical installation of pressure plates and cover caps. The design basis should define the performance criteria before drawings progress. This includes wind load, serviceability limits, air permeability, water penetration resistance, thermal targets, acoustic requirements, fire strategy, seismic or drift movement where applicable, and durability in the local climate. A coastal tower in the Gulf, for example, needs a different approach to material selection, solar load and sealant exposure than a sheltered urban development in northern Europe. Design the water path deliberately Water management is the first test of a curtain wall detail. The external gasket line and sealant joints reduce water entry, but they should not be assumed to be perfect for the building’s entire service life. A reliable system anticipates incidental water ingress and directs it safely to the exterior. Use a drained and pressure-equalised approach The glazing pocket, mullion and transom zones need a continuous drainage path. Water entering the outer zone must travel through designed collection chambers and weep routes without being blocked by setting blocks, fasteners, splice sleeves, insulation or poorly located baffles. Each horizontal-to-vertical junction requires particular care: water must pass from the transom zone into the mullion drainage channel, then out through correctly sized and positioned weep holes. Pressure equalisation supports this process. If the drained cavity is connected appropriately to external pressure, wind-driven water is less likely to be forced across internal seals. The precise arrangement depends on the proprietary system, but the principle does not change: do not interrupt the pressure-equalisation chamber with ad hoc brackets, infill pieces or untested site modifications. At interfaces, maintain the hierarchy of defences. The curtain wall should shed water externally; the perimeter interface should form a compatible secondary weather line; and the internal air seal should remain continuous. A single line of sealant between facade and structure is not a credible strategy for a demanding building envelope. Resolve movement before fixing locations Curtain walls move. Aluminium expands and contracts significantly, glass deflects under wind, floors shorten or creep, slabs deflect, and the structural frame may move differently from the facade. Details must distinguish between movements that are expected, movements that are exceptional and movements that should be restrained. Bracket design is a primary control point. The fixing arrangement normally needs a fixed point to establish panel position and sliding points to accommodate differential movement. Slot direction, washer arrangement, fixing edge distances and access for tightening must all be shown. A bracket that works geometrically in a model may still be impossible to install or adjust on site. Allowance for construction tolerance is equally important. Survey data, slab-edge deviation, embed plate position and steelwork tolerances should be assessed early. The facade must have sufficient adjustment range without creating oversized gaps, compromised fire stopping or visually inconsistent joint lines. Do not consume all tolerance at one interface and leave the next trade with an unbuildable condition. Coordinate the slab edge as a complete assembly The slab edge typically carries structural anchors, insulation, smoke and fire barriers, cavity closures, perimeter air seals and internal finishes. These components compete for space. Detail them together at a realistic scale, including fixing heads, packers, sealant depth, backing materials and installation clearances. The perimeter fire barrier must maintain compartmentation while accommodating facade movement. Its compression, fixing method, smoke seal arrangement and supporting substrate need to match the tested or assessed system. Treating fire stopping as a late-stage builder’s work item is a common source of compliance risk. The facade detail should identify its required location, movement zone and interface responsibilities from the outset. Control thermal, condensation and comfort performance Thermal continuity is often lost at brackets, slab edges, spandrel zones and transitions to opaque cladding. A visually neat detail can still create a cold bridge that increases heat loss, perimeter discomfort or condensation risk. Review the complete heat-flow path, not merely the centre-of-glass value. Spandrel details require disciplined coordination. The insulated zone should be continuous where possible, while the backpan, framing, fire barrier and slab-edge insulation are arranged to avoid exposed conductive routes. Glass specification, coating position, frit pattern and cavity treatment should also be coordinated with the facade engineer and architect. Changes made for appearance can affect solar control, thermal stress and visual uniformity. Internal humidity and room use matter. Hospitals, pools, kitchens and highly occupied spaces can impose more severe condensation conditions than standard offices. The appropriate detail depends on the internal environmental criteria, external climate and mechanical-services strategy. Generic details are rarely sufficient for these spaces. Detail glass support, joints and material compatibility Glass must be supported, restrained and isolated correctly. Setting blocks should carry the glass at defined locations without blocking drainage. Their material, length and position should suit the pane weight and framing geometry. Edge clearances must accommodate manufacturing tolerances, thermal movement and wind deflection without allowing glass-to-metal contact. Specify joint geometry rather than simply calling for ‘sealant’. Structural silicone, weatherseal silicone, internal air seals and compatibility sealants have different functions. Joint width, bite, depth, backing material and substrate preparation affect performance. Where structural glazing is used, the design should align with the approved system supplier’s engineering, fabrication controls and quality records. Material compatibility deserves the same attention. EPDM, silicone, tapes, coatings, insulation facings and cleaning agents can interact adversely. Avoid assumptions based on appearance or previous projects. Confirm compatibility through the relevant system suppliers and testing evidence, particularly where membranes, pressure-sensitive tapes or coated aluminium are involved. Make the detail buildable in BIM and on site A curtain wall detail is not complete when it looks correct in a PDF. It is complete when it can be coordinated, fabricated, installed, inspected and maintained. BIM models should identify the panel breakdown, zones, bracket logic, primary interfaces and coordination clearances without pretending to replace fabrication-level responsibility. Use model-based coordination to test the recurring high-risk areas: slab-edge interfaces, corners, podium transitions, movement joints, roof terminations, entrances, louvre interfaces and facade-access zones. Then issue 1:1 or enlarged details for conditions where the installation sequence or tolerance relationship cannot be understood from the model alone. Site verification is essential. Early benchmark panels and mock-ups allow the project team to test appearance, drainage, air and water performance, installation methodology and interface coordination before repetition magnifies an error across the building. Inspection should check more than visible alignment. Confirm gasket engagement, drainage openings, fastener installation, sealant workmanship, fire-barrier continuity and records of non-conformance closure. Treat transitions as primary design conditions Most curtain wall failures occur at transitions rather than in repetitive central bays. Corners, parapets, low-level interfaces, doors, soffits, roof junctions and changes between curtain wall, rainscreen and glazing systems need dedicated design time. They often involve different materials, trades and movement regimes, which makes ownership unclear unless the drawings set it out. The same applies to maintenance. Glass replacement routes, access equipment restraints, opening-light operation, cleaning reach and replacement of consumable seals should be considered before the facade is fixed. A detail that cannot be inspected or repaired safely transfers cost and risk to the asset owner. The strongest curtain wall details do not rely on optimistic workmanship or unrecorded site decisions. They make water, air, heat, movement, fire safety and installation responsibilities visible at every interface - giving the project team a facade that can be built with confidence and perform long after handover.

A glass specification can make an elegant elevation perform poorly if it is selected as a finish rather than as part of the building envelope. The question, “how to select glass for exterior facade?”, should therefore begin with the building’s exposure, occupancy and system design - not with a sample panel or a target U-value alone. For airports, hospitals, hotels, offices and residential towers, glazing affects energy demand, glare, external noise, occupant comfort, fire strategy, maintenance and programme certainty. The right glass is the one that satisfies these requirements together while remaining available, manufacturable and visually consistent at the required scale. How to select glass for an exterior facade: start with performance Glass should be selected against a clear facade performance brief. This brief needs to identify the project location, orientation, local climate, room use, window-to-wall ratio, shading strategy and relevant statutory requirements. It must also define who owns the thermal, daylight, structural and acoustic criteria. Without this coordination, a glass choice can appear compliant in isolation yet undermine the completed facade. A south- or west-facing glazed office elevation in a hot climate may require strong solar control to limit cooling loads and glare. A hospital façade may place greater weight on patient comfort, acoustic privacy and safe breakage behaviour. A hotel may need excellent acoustic attenuation beside a road or airport while preserving clear views and a refined external appearance. The design team should establish target values before comparing products. Typical criteria include centre-pane U-value, total solar energy transmittance or g-value, visible light transmittance, external and internal reflectance, acoustic rating, safety classification, fire performance where relevant, and thermal stress resistance. The glazing build-up should then be assessed as part of the complete curtain wall, window wall or punched-window system. Frame losses, edge spacers, spandrel zones, seals and installation tolerances all affect delivered performance. Balance solar control, daylight and appearance Solar-control coatings reduce the proportion of solar energy entering the building. They are often essential in warm climates and on highly exposed elevations, but stronger solar control usually reduces visible light transmission. This is the central trade-off: lower solar gain can reduce cooling demand and glare, while insufficient daylight can increase artificial-light use and make interiors feel subdued. A low g-value is not automatically the best answer. Its suitability depends on orientation, external shading, internal blinds, operating hours and the client’s energy model. Deep façade fins or overhangs may allow a less selective coating than an unshaded elevation. Conversely, a heavily glazed west façade may demand a more selective solar-control glass, even if that changes the external colour or reflectance. Mock-ups and large-format samples are critical. Glass can look neutral in a small sample but appear blue, green, grey or mirror-like across a full elevation, particularly under changing sky conditions. Perceived colour also changes with glass thickness, coating position, laminated interlayers, ceramic frit, adjacent opaque materials and the shadow created by the framing system. Visual consistency requires more than naming a coating. Specify acceptable tolerances for colour, reflectance, distortion and anisotropy, then review representative production samples. Where multiple glass processors or batches are anticipated, procurement controls should be set early. Late substitutions are a common cause of visibly uneven elevations. Do not assess glass in isolation The same insulated glass unit can perform differently once installed in a facade system. Vision glass beside a dark spandrel panel may experience different thermal conditions. Shadow boxes, internal insulation and cavity ventilation influence heat build-up, while mullion depth and pressure plates alter sightlines and perceived transparency. At detailed design stage, the facade engineer should review edge cover, setting blocks, drainage paths, gasket compatibility, bite dimensions and support conditions. These details determine whether the proposed glass can withstand wind, thermal and dead-load actions without excessive deflection, seal failure or edge damage. Select the right glass build-up for safety and resilience Safety glass selection should be based on the actual hazard, not a generic preference for toughened or laminated glass. Toughened glass offers increased strength and breaks into small fragments, but it can be vulnerable to rare spontaneous breakage associated with nickel sulphide inclusions. Heat-soak testing can reduce this risk where appropriate, although it does not eliminate it. Laminated glass retains fragments after breakage because the interlayer holds the panes together. This makes it essential in many overhead, fall-protection, balustrade, security and post-breakage retention applications. Interlayer type matters. Standard PVB may be appropriate for many uses, while ionoplast or specialised acoustic interlayers can provide improved stiffness, acoustic performance or durability for demanding applications. The following questions should be resolved for each zone of the facade: Is there a risk of human impact, falling glass or impact from maintenance activity? Does the glass form a barrier, overhead element, rooflight, canopy or access route? Is enhanced security, forced-entry resistance or blast resistance required? Are there local fire, evacuation or compartmentation requirements affecting the assembly? Will the glass be exposed to high thermal stress from coating, frit, shading or partial shadow? These decisions should be coordinated with structural loading and applicable codes. A safety designation alone does not confirm that the panel is suitable for project-specific wind pressure, inter-storey movement, impact or post-breakage requirements. Treat acoustics as a glazing-system decision Noise control is often lost through weak points rather than through the centre of the glass. A high-performing acoustic laminated unit will not deliver its expected rating if the frame, perimeter seal, trickle vent or opening configuration creates an air path. For projects close to transport corridors, entertainment districts or operational airports, begin with a measured noise assessment and identify the required internal criteria by room type. The glazing build-up can then be tuned through pane thickness, asymmetric construction, cavity width and acoustic interlayers. Asymmetry is valuable because identical panes can share resonant frequencies, reducing performance at certain sound bands. The facade system must also accommodate the required glass thickness and weight. Heavier acoustic units affect panel handling, unitised frame design, opening hardware, lifting plans and installation sequencing. This is where early engineering protects both acoustic performance and programme. Design for thermal comfort, not only energy compliance A facade can meet an overall energy target while creating local discomfort. Occupants seated near glass may experience cold downdraughts in winter, radiant heat gain in summer or glare at particular times of day. Glass selection should be tested with the internal environment in mind, particularly for workstations, patient rooms, guest rooms and high-dwell public spaces. Low-emissivity coatings improve insulating performance by reducing radiant heat transfer. In insulating glass units, warm-edge spacers and appropriate cavity fills further improve edge performance and help manage condensation risk. However, more demanding glass build-ups often increase unit thickness, weight and cost. The selected facade system must be capable of accommodating them without compromising drainage, pressure equalisation or movement capacity. Condensation analysis should consider local climate, indoor humidity, thermal bridging and interface details. This is especially relevant in humid regions, conditioned interiors and buildings with strict hygiene or asset-protection requirements. Confirm constructability, maintenance and procurement early The best technical specification is of limited value if it cannot be reliably manufactured, transported, installed or replaced. Oversized panes may create handling constraints, require specialist lifting equipment and increase replacement risk. Complex curved glass, triple glazing, deep laminates and bespoke frit patterns can introduce extended lead times and tighter yield constraints. A coordinated glass schedule should state the complete build-up, coating surface, heat treatment, interlayer, spacer, edge treatment, safety requirement, visual-quality criteria and required testing. It should also identify interfaces with fritted zones, spandrels, operable vents and facade access equipment. Facade Design Manager typically addresses these issues through coordinated design, BIM-based interface control, engineering review and construction-stage quality verification. The aim is not simply to nominate glass, but to ensure the selected build-up performs within the fabricated facade and can be inspected, maintained and replaced over the building’s service life. Before final release, review a physical mock-up where project risk justifies it. Test air and water tightness, structural behaviour, thermal movement and visual quality in the assembled system. This provides far more confidence than relying on individual product data sheets. The right glass selection is a disciplined project decision: one that protects the architectural intent while giving the completed facade a credible margin for climate, use, movement and time.

A highly glazed elevation can meet an architectural brief and still create an uncomfortable building. Excess solar gain raises cooling demand; uncontrolled daylight produces glare; poorly coordinated shading introduces water, wind-load and maintenance risks. Effective façade sun shading design and system options must therefore be resolved as part of the building envelope, not added as a visual feature after the glazing system is fixed. For airports, hotels, hospitals, offices and residential towers, the right approach balances solar control with views, daylight, structural performance, access and manufacturability. The best system is rarely the one with the most dramatic geometry. It is the system that performs reliably in its orientation, climate and operational context, while remaining buildable at full scale. Start with orientation, use and solar exposure Shading design should begin with façade-specific analysis. A horizontal blade that performs well on a south-facing elevation in the northern hemisphere may offer little protection to a west-facing façade exposed to low afternoon sun. In equatorial regions, sun paths are high for much of the year, but low-angle morning and evening glare can remain a major comfort issue. The building’s use is equally important. Patient rooms, hotel bedrooms, control rooms and open-plan workplaces have different tolerance levels for glare, visual privacy and occupant control. A façade serving a reception space may prioritise openness and daylight, while a façade at a critical workstation may require a far more controlled daylight condition. The design team should establish performance criteria early. This normally includes target glazing solar factor, glare risk, daylight availability, peak cooling loads, external reflected light and required views out. The shading system can then be sized and positioned against measurable outcomes rather than aesthetic preference alone. Façade sun shading design and system options External shading is generally more effective than internal blinds because it intercepts solar radiation before it passes through the glass. However, its success depends on the relationship between blade geometry, glazing specification, orientation and fixing strategy. Fixed horizontal fins and overhangs Horizontal fins are a strong option for high-angle solar exposure. They are commonly used above vision glazing, along floor lines or as continuous projecting shelves. On appropriately oriented façades, they can reduce direct summer sun while allowing useful daylight and lower-angle winter sun. Their limitation is clear on east and west elevations. Low-angle solar penetration can pass beneath horizontal elements, particularly in the morning and late afternoon. Deep projections may also reduce sky view, increase structural demand and complicate cleaning access. The depth, spacing and pitch of each blade require solar modelling rather than rule-of-thumb dimensions. Vertical fins and deep reveals Vertical fins are often better suited to east and west façades because they restrict low-angle sun from the side. They can be aligned perpendicular to the façade or rotated to respond to a specific solar direction. Deep window reveals can provide a related effect while strengthening the visual depth of the elevation. A vertical system must be checked carefully for outward views, especially in hotels, residential buildings and premium office spaces. Closely spaced or heavily angled fins may control glare effectively but can create a confined internal experience. The visual impact from inside matters as much as the external composition. Egg-crate and grid shading Where solar exposure varies substantially, combined horizontal and vertical elements can provide more consistent protection. Often described as egg-crate shading, this approach works well for façades with broad exposure or spaces requiring stable visual conditions. The trade-off is increased material, connection complexity and interface coordination. Junctions must accommodate drainage, thermal movement and tolerance between the primary curtain wall or window wall and the secondary shading frame. On tall buildings, wind loads and vibration can make apparently simple grids a significant engineering exercise. Perforated screens and expanded-metal systems Perforated aluminium panels, woven metal mesh and expanded-metal screens provide solar filtering, privacy and a distinctive façade expression. Their performance is influenced by open-area ratio, panel depth, finish, angle and distance from the glazing. A screen with the same perforation percentage can behave very differently when mounted flat against the façade or set off on brackets. These systems are valuable where a project needs a more uniform elevation, including car parks, plant areas, hotel back-of-house zones and façades subject to intense sun. They require early review of outward visibility, internal daylight, cleaning methods and potential soiling. In coastal, desert or polluted urban environments, coating selection and drainage detailing are essential to maintain appearance. Operable shading Operable louvers, sliding screens and automated blinds can respond to changing solar conditions. They offer flexibility where the façade experiences variable exposure or where occupants require greater control. In premium commercial and hospitality projects, this can improve comfort without permanently compromising daylight or views. However, movement introduces operational risk. Motors, controls, sensors, power supplies and maintenance access must be designed as seriously as the visible façade components. Systems should have clear control logic, manual override arrangements and safe failure positions. A sophisticated kinetic façade that cannot be maintained is a liability, not an asset. Integrated glazing solutions Solar-control coatings, fritted glass, ceramic printing and interlayers can reduce solar gain without external projections. These approaches are useful where planning constraints, façade access limitations or architectural intent rule out deep shading elements. They should not be treated as a direct substitute for external shading in every case. Darker solar-control glass may reduce cooling loads but can also reduce visible light transmission and alter façade appearance. Frit patterns can manage glare and bird-strike risk, yet their density and placement must be coordinated with sightlines and thermal stress analysis. The glazing specification, shading geometry and internal lighting strategy should be developed together. Design the support system, not only the blades The most common failures in sun shading occur at interfaces. A fin may be visually correct in elevation but unsupported by a viable load path, poorly isolated thermally, or impossible to install around curtain wall anchors and slab edges. Each system needs a defined primary support strategy. This may be brackets fixed back to slab edges, mullion-reinforced curtain wall zones, independent steelwork or a secondary aluminium frame. The choice affects movement, tolerances, installation sequencing, fire stopping and façade access. Long aluminium blades also require allowance for thermal expansion, particularly on sun-exposed elevations in hot climates. Wind loading requires project-specific assessment. Projecting fins and screens can attract high local pressures at corners, parapets and tower crowns. Connections must address positive and negative wind actions, fatigue where vibration is possible, and accidental impact where shading is accessible from terraces or public areas. Thermal bridging is another critical consideration. Brackets penetrating the insulation line should be designed with appropriate thermal breaks and assessed within the whole-wall calculation. A shading system that reduces solar gain but creates widespread conductive heat loss or condensation risk has not achieved a balanced envelope solution. Coordinate access, drainage and maintenance from concept stage Sun shading changes how the façade is cleaned, inspected and repaired. A building maintenance unit may not pass between projecting elements. Rope-access routes may be obstructed. Removable panels may be required for glazing replacement, while bird deterrents and drainage paths may be needed to prevent staining beneath horizontal blades. These matters should be reviewed before the system is tendered. Coordination in BIM is particularly valuable where brackets, access equipment, window-opening zones, lighting, signage and MEP penetrations share a congested façade zone. A coordinated model can identify clashes early, but it must be supported by clear fabrication details and installation tolerances. For existing buildings, inspection should precede any retrofit shading proposal. The structural capacity of the existing façade or slab edge, the condition of sealants and fixings, water-management routes and the presence of concealed services all influence what can safely be added. Use prototypes to test the real façade condition Solar studies and calculations guide the design, but they do not replace physical verification. A representative mock-up can test the visual density of fins, bracket deflection, drainage, interface seals, coating quality and installation sequence. It also gives architects and owners a direct view of the internal experience: glare, view obstruction, reflected light and perceived enclosure. Façade Design Manager approaches shading as an integrated envelope component, coordinating architectural intent with engineering, BIM detailing, access planning and construction-stage quality assurance. This reduces the gap between an attractive rendered image and a system that can be manufactured, installed and maintained. The right shading strategy gives occupants calmer daylight, lower solar stress and clearer views without burdening the façade with unnecessary complexity. Set the performance targets early, test the details at full scale, and require every blade, bracket and interface to earn its place on the building.

"Streamline your facade works execution with precise tender documentation and dedicated site support services at Facade Design Manager. Unlock efficiency and excellence in every project phase with our tailored solutions." Dr. Dimitrie Gerota Emergency Hospital Bucharest, ROMANIA 1/1 Dr. Dimitrie Gerota Emergency Hospital has been developed in full accordance with NZEB (Nearly Zero Energy Building) performance criteria. The entire building envelope is engineered as a high-performance thermal enclosure, ensuring compliance with all NZEB standards. The façade incorporates a combination of glazed and opaque elements using multiple advanced façade systems, including: Stick curtain wall (CW) system Double-skin façade Mesh screen façade Channel glass façade Ceramic-clad rainscreen system External insulated façade system Mesh roof screen system A custom stick curtain wall system is designed with horizontally and vertically protruding mullions, incorporating integrated LED lighting to satisfy the architectural design intent and enhance the building’s nighttime identity. To meet the overall architectural objectives, a custom double-skin façade with an outer aluminum mesh layer has been developed. The perforated mesh provides a unique architectural expression while maintaining a lightweight structure. The system enables modular fabrication and installation for improved constructability and quality control. How NZEB (Net Zero Energy Building) compliant facades are designed? Selecting appropriate TGU (Triple Glass Unit) responding to the NZEB requirements with U values under 0.8 W/m2K Research for the high thermal insulation featuring stick curtain wall system with thermal isolator in both mullions and transoms. Introducing a double step bracket system with thermal blockers to eliminate thermal bridging. Proper thermal infilling of all cavities behind the facade systems and interfaces with the building structure. Special care in detailing of rainscreen facade systems to benefit from the ventilated cavity to increase thermal performance while using high performance thermal insulating cladding materials. A full scope of façade consultancy services was provided to the architectural design team, including: Façade material studies and technical evaluations Performance criteria development and compliance advisory Detailed façade design packages and shop-drawing coordination Performance-based technical specifications Bill of Quantities (BOQ) preparation Structural system integration and coordination Multidisciplinary interface review and resolution Client: NKY Design: NKY Architects & Engineers Popaescu Architects BACK TO PROJECTS

consultancy services to architects and contractors through facade design services. Facade Design Managerhttps://static.wixstatic.com/media/ff9754_a64f7bb722b1441da559824beaf05b9a~mv2.pnghttps://static.wixstatic.com/media/ff9754_9987e7688c4d426bbe10148301bd01ed%7Emv2.jpg Explore our services and get in touch Our Services 01. Custom Project Planning Embark on a unique journey to craft a bespoke solution tailored precisely to your needs. We collaborate closely with you to define project scope, objectives, and deliverables, ensuring a perfect fit for your vision. Show more 02. Personal Solution Design Receive a personalized approach designed to address your specific challenges and aspirations. We focus on understanding your unique situation to co-create a plan that leads to your desired outcomes. Show more 03. Expert Strategy Guidance Leverage seasoned expertise to navigate complex decisions and chart a clear path forward. Our guidance package offers insights and strategic recommendations to help you achieve your goals with confidence. Show more

Explore the art of conceptual facade design at Facade Design Manager. Unlock creativity and functionality with our intuitive tools and expert guidance. From concept to realization, streamline your process for stunning architectural outcomes. Dive into innovative solutions now! Taegutec Office Building facade design Taegutec Office Building facade design Taegutec Office Building elevated glazed facade Taegutec Office Building facade design 1/7 TAEGUTEC Head Office Izmit, TURKEY Taegutec Head Office building is composed of an elevated randomly screened glazed mass of office areas on top a fully glazed ground floor and a floating exposed concrete mass of a conference hall. Elevated box is glazed with a single row of capless stick system with IGUs and ACPs at the bottom and top, all of which are screened by a series of aluminium single span tubes each varying in form. Ground floor is glazed with capped curtain wall system. BACK TO PROJECTS